Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 13.588
1.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 52(3): 78-86, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38721959

INTRODUCTION: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic and relapsing inflammatory skin disease mainly affecting children. Similarly, Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is an inflammatory skin disease, but unlike AD it results from direct exposure to an external agent. Theoretically, the impaired skin barrier facilitates the penetration of potential allergens. Therefore, AD patients are at risk for an associated ACD, exacerbating their skin condition. Because eczema is similar, performing a patch test (PT) for the differential diagnosis is essential. METHODS: In this cross-sectional transversal study, we performed a PT with 30 sensitizers in 26 children with AD, selected according to established criteria for suspected ACD, and treated at an AD center of a pediatric university hospital in Rio de Janeiro. Clinical presentation, patient profile, main sensitizers, and frequency of ACD caused by therapeutic skincare products were evaluated. RESULTS: In all, 23 (88.5%) patients reacted to at least one allergen, 21 (80.7%) had a relevant positive patch test, and 15 (57.7%) were polysensitized. The main positive sensitizers were nickel (38.5%), blue disperse (30.8%), fragrance mix (30.8%), and neomycin (23.1%). Nineteen (73%) patients reacted to substances present in therapeutic or skincare products. CONCLUSION: Our data underscore the importance of performing a PT in AD children whose eczema has atypical distribution. The expressive percentage of positive tests, especially of allergens in skincare products, indicates the constant need to review the proposed treatments. Therefore, we recommend a specific and expanded PT battery for pediatric AD patients, including a negative control, to increase sensitivity for diagnosing ACD.


Allergens , Dermatitis, Atopic , Patch Tests , Humans , Patch Tests/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dermatitis, Atopic/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Atopic/immunology , Child , Female , Male , Brazil , Allergens/immunology , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/immunology , Infant , Diagnosis, Differential
3.
Ital J Dermatol Venerol ; 159(2): 83-104, 2024 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38650492

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a common inflammatory skin disease caused by delayed hypersensitivity to chemical and biotic contact allergens. ACD significantly affects the patients' quality of life negatively impacting both occupational and non-occupational settings. Patch testing is the gold standard diagnostic in vivo test to precise the ACD etiology and to correctly perform prevention. According to the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) legislative decree no. 178 of 29th May 1991, allergens are defined as medicines and therefore they are subject to strict regulation. In 2017, AIFA (decree no. 2130/2017) started a procedure to regulate contact allergens on the Italian market and actually the contact allergens temporarily authorized are reported in AIFA decree no. 98/2022, valid until November 2023. The availability on the market of contact allergens to diagnose ACD and continuous updating on the basis of new epidemiological trends are mandatory, jointly with the continuous update of the baseline and integrative series for patch testing. For this reason, the scientific community represented in Italy by the Skin Allergies Study Group of SIDeMaST (Italian Society of Dermatology and Venereology) and SIDAPA (Italian Society of Allergological, Occupational and Environmental Dermatology) are constantly working, in close relationship with the European scientific communities with large expertise in this important sector of the modern Dermatology. Herein, we report the setting up of regulatory legislation by AIFA and the new Italian Adult Baseline Series for patch testing.


Allergens , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Patch Tests , Italy , Patch Tests/methods , Humans , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/immunology
4.
J Nepal Health Res Counc ; 21(3): 467-471, 2024 Mar 22.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38615219

BACKGROUND: Allergic contact dermatitis is one of the most common forms of skin diseases that require medical intervention. Appropriate detection of allergens by patch test and accurate avoidance of them is the key to management. The objective of this study is to determine the types and frequency of allergens responsible for Allergic contact dermatitis in a tertiary hospital of Nepal. METHODS: Altogether 120 patients with Allergic contact dermatitis were enrolled in the study. Patch test was performed to find out the most common inciting allergen, utilizing the Indian Standard Series of allergens approved by The Contact and Occupational Dermatoses Forum of India. Results were read at 48 and 96 hours. Grading of the reactions was done based on the criteria of the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Pattern of reactivity of different allergens was assessed. RESULTS: Of all the patients, 63 (53%) showed positivity to at least one allergen. Nickel sulfate was the most frequent sensitizing agent in 22 (18%) cases, followed by Fragrance mix in 11(9%) and Paraphenylenediamine in 7 (6%) cases. Out of all positive results, Grade 1 positivity was seen in 44 (51%), Grade 2 positivity in 41(47%) and only 2 (2%) cases showed Grade 3 positivity. Mercaptobenzothiazole, Balsam of Peru, Nitrofurazone and Wool Alcohol did not show positive results in any of our patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patch testing helps in the treatment, long term remission, and patient counseling for prevention. Larger scale studies are required to know the sensitivity to allergens in Nepalese population.


Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Humans , Allergens/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Nepal/epidemiology , Patch Tests , South Asian People
5.
Toxicol Ind Health ; 40(6): 306-311, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38575135

Rinse-off cosmetic products, primarily shampoos, are frequently implicated in the onset of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) caused by alkyl glucosides (AGs). AGs are increasingly popular surfactants and known contact allergens. Glucoside-induced ACD was most frequently observed with shampoos and skin-cleansing products in both consumer and occupational settings. Thereby, studies have shown that atopic individuals are the most susceptible to ACD. Also, several investigations have indicated that individuals with sensitive skin might be more prone to skin allergies. This is why the presence of AGs was investigated in shampoos and body cleansers marketed as hypoallergenic or for sensitive skin. For this purpose, the website of Amazon.com was surveyed. Four groups of cosmetics were obtained by using the following keywords: "hypoallergenic shampoo for adults," "sensitive skin shampoo for adults," "hypoallergenic body cleanser for adults," and "sensitive skin body cleanser for adults." The first 30 best-selling cosmetics in each group were investigated for the presence of AGs, by analyzing the product information pages. The results showed that as much as 56.7% of hypoallergenic shampoos contained AGs, as ingredients, whereas the percentage was somewhat lower for other product categories. Even though decyl and lauryl glucoside were nearly ubiquitously used AGs in cosmetics over the past decade, the most commonly present AG in our analysis was coco-glucoside. The results of this study indicated a necessity to include coco-glucoside in the baseline series of patch testing allergens. Industry, regulators, and healthcare providers should be made aware of the frequent presence of AGs in rinse-off cosmetic products marketed as hypoallergenic or for sensitive skin to ensure the safety and well-being of consumers and patients.


Cosmetics , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Glucosides , Glucosides/analysis , Humans , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Cosmetics/adverse effects , Cosmetics/chemistry , Allergens/analysis , Hair Preparations/adverse effects , Hair Preparations/chemistry , Skin/drug effects
6.
Cutis ; 113(3): 119-122, 2024 Mar.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38648590

Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) is an increasingly common diagnosis, especially in middle-aged women, and has garnered growing attention in the scientific literature. This variant of lichen planopilaris (LPP) is recognized as a progressive scarring alopecia affecting the frontal and temporal regions of the scalp as well as the eyebrows and occasionally other sites. Although its precise etiology remains elusive, various factors such as genetics, medications, hormonal influences, and environmental exposures-including specific chemicals present in sunscreens-have been implicated in its pathogenesis but without evidence of causality. The potential relationship between contact allergy and FFA has been explored, with some suggesting an increased prevalence of contact allergy among patients diagnosed with FFA. This article aims to explore the potential association between contact allergy and FFA, focusing on the current published literature and implicated allergens.


Alopecia , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Lichen Planus , Humans , Alopecia/etiology , Alopecia/diagnosis , Alopecia/pathology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Lichen Planus/diagnosis , Lichen Planus/etiology , Female
7.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 149: 105623, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38631606

The Bone-Marrow derived Dendritic Cell (BMDC) test is a promising assay for identifying sensitizing chemicals based on the 3Rs (Replace, Reduce, Refine) principle. This study expanded the BMDC benchmarking to various in vitro, in chemico, and in silico assays targeting different key events (KE) in the skin sensitization pathway, using common substances datasets. Additionally, a Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) model was developed to predict the BMDC test outcomes for sensitizing or non-sensitizing chemicals. The modeling workflow involved ISIDA (In Silico Design and Data Analysis) molecular fragment descriptors and the SVM (Support Vector Machine) machine-learning method. The BMDC model's performance was at least comparable to that of all ECVAM-validated models regardless of the KE considered. Compared with other tests targeting KE3, related to dendritic cell activation, BMDC assay was shown to have higher balanced accuracy and sensitivity concerning both the Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) and human labels, providing additional evidence for its reliability. The consensus QSAR model exhibits promising results, correlating well with observed sensitization potential. Integrated into a publicly available web service, the BMDC-based QSAR model may serve as a cost-effective and rapid alternative to lab experiments, providing preliminary screening for sensitization potential, compound prioritization, optimization and risk assessment.


Benchmarking , Dendritic Cells , Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship , Dendritic Cells/drug effects , Humans , Animals , Support Vector Machine , Computer Simulation , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Allergens/toxicity , Animal Testing Alternatives/methods , Bone Marrow Cells/drug effects , Local Lymph Node Assay , Mice
8.
Biochem Pharmacol ; 223: 116163, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38522555

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a common skin disease featured with skin inflammation and a mixed itch/pain sensation. The itch/pain causes the desire to scratch, affecting both physical and psychological aspects of patients. Nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying itch/pain sensation of ACD still remain elusive. Here, we found that oxidative stress and oxidation-related injury were remarkably increased in the inflamed skin of a mouse model of ACD. Reducing oxidative stress significantly attenuated itch/pain-related scratching, allokonesis and skin inflammation. RNA-Sequencing reveals oxidative stress contributes to a series of skin biological processes, including inflammation and immune response. Attenuating oxidative stress reduces overproduction of IL-1ß and IL-33, two critical cytokines involved in inflammation and pain/itch, in the inflamed skin of model mice. Exogenously injecting H2O2 into the neck skin of naïve mice triggered IL-33 overproduction in skin keratinocytes and induced scratching, which was reduced in mice deficient in IL-33 receptor ST2. ACD model mice showed remarkable neutrophil infiltration in the inflamed skin. Blocking neutrophil infiltration reduced oxidative stress and attenuated scratching and skin inflammation. Therefore, our study reveals a critical contribution of neutrophil-derived oxidative stress to skin inflammation and itch/pain-related scratching of ACD model mice via mechanisms involving the triggering of IL-33 overproduction in skin keratinocytes. Targeting skin oxidative stress may represent an effective therapy for ameliorating ACD.


Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Interleukin-33 , Humans , Animals , Mice , Interleukin-33/genetics , Cytokines , Hydrogen Peroxide/pharmacology , Neutrophils , Skin , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/psychology , Pruritus/chemically induced , Disease Models, Animal , Inflammation , Pain
9.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 104: adv19676, 2024 Mar 29.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38551376

Allergic contact dermatitis is reported among individuals using continuous glucose monitoring systems and insulin pumps. The aim of this study was to describe contact allergy patterns for allergens in the Swedish baseline series and medical device-related allergens among users. Contact allergy to baseline series allergens and isobornyl acrylate was compared between diabetes patients and dermatitis patients patch-tested at the Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology during 2017 to 2020. Fifty- four diabetes patients and 2,567 dermatitis patients were included. The prevalence of contact allergy to fragrance mix II and sesquiterpene lactone mix was significantly higher in diabetes patients compared with dermatitis patients. Of the diabetes patients 13.0% and of the dermatitis patients 0.5% tested positive to sesquiterpene lactone mix (p < 0.001). Of the diabetes patients 7.4% and of the dermatitis patients 2.3% tested positive to fragrance mix II (p = 0.041). Of the diabetes patients 70.4% tested positive to medical device-related allergens. Of the diabetes patients 63.0% and of the dermatitis patients 0.2% were allergic to isobornyl acrylate (p < 0.001). In conclusion, not only medical device-related contact allergies, but also contact allergy to baseline series allergens (fragrance mix II and sesquiterpene lactone mix), is overrepresented in diabetes patients who use medical devices.


Acrylates , Camphanes , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Diabetes Mellitus , Sesquiterpenes , Humans , Allergens/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Sweden/epidemiology , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring , Blood Glucose , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/chemically induced , Patch Tests , Lactones
10.
Cutis ; 113(1): 35-42, 2024 Jan.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38478935

The differential diagnosis of dermatoses in the axillae is broad. Contact dermatitis-both irritant and allergic-represents common etiologies. Axillary contact dermatitis can develop following exposure to a variety of irritants and/or allergens. Frequently implicated sources include deodorants, antiperspirants, detergents, soaps, and clothing. Fragrance, a ubiquitous ingredient within these products, as well as metals and dyes, are common causes of contact dermatitis. Clinical assessment, bedside diagnostic techniques, histopathology, and patch testing can aid in the diagnosis and help inform management directions.


Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Dermatitis, Irritant , Humans , Allergens/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/therapy , Patch Tests , Dermatitis, Irritant/etiology , Diagnosis, Differential
11.
Cutis ; 113(1): E11-E14, 2024 Jan.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38478942

"Leaves of three, leave it be" serves as an apt caution for avoiding poison ivy (Toxicodendron species) and its dermatitis-inducing sap. Toxicodendron contact dermatitis (TCD) poses a notable burden to the American health care system by accounting for half a million reported cases of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) annually. Identifying and avoiding physical contact with the western poison ivy (Toxicodendron rydbergii) plant prevails as the chief method of preventing TCD. This article discusses common features of T rydbergii as well as clinical manifestations and treatment options following exposure to this allergenic plant.


Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Dermatitis, Toxicodendron , Toxicodendron , Humans , Dermatitis, Toxicodendron/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Allergens
12.
Tunis Med ; 102(3): 164-169, 2024 Mar 05.
Article Fr | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38545712

INTRODUCTION: Several clinical and epidemiological data point to a possible link between smoking exposure and contact dermatitis (CD). AIMS: To identify the clinical and epidemiological differences of CD in smoking and non-smoking subjects, and to determine the influence of smoking on the allergological profile of CD. METHODS: Retrospective descriptive study who consulted the Department of Occupational Medicine and Occupational Pathology of the Farhat Hached University Hospital of Sousse (Tunisia) during a period of 8 years for exploration of CD and who were tested with the European Standard Battery (ESB). RESULTS: A total of 767 patients were enrolled during the study period, 40% of whom were smokers. The group of smokers was characterized by a male predominance (p=10-3) and a greater professional seniority compared to non-smokers (p=0.01). Personal history of atopy was predominant in non-smokers (p=0.02). Among the ESB allergens, there was a significant association between smoking and CD due to metals (chromium, cobalt) and conservatives. After binary logistic regression, the variables associated with smoking exposure were male gender (OR=12.12 ; 95% CI=[6.07 - 24.21]; p=10-3), Kathon CG allergy (OR=3.69 ; 95% CI=[1.24 - 10.81]; p=0.018), and right hand involvement (OR= 2.83; 95% CI=[1.29 - 6.17]; p=0.005). CONCLUSION: Our study revealed an effect of smoking on the clinical and allergological characteristics of CD.


Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Humans , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking/epidemiology , Allergens , Occupations
13.
Arch Toxicol ; 98(5): 1253-1269, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38483583

Since the 1940s, patch tests in healthy volunteers (Human Predictive Patch Tests, HPPTs) have been used to identify chemicals that cause skin sensitization in humans. Recently, we reported the results of a major curation effort to support the development of OECD Guideline 497 on Defined Approaches (DAs) for skin sensitization (OECD in Guideline No. 497: Defined Approaches on Skin Sensitisation, 2021a. https://doi.org/10.1787/b92879a4-en ). In the course of this work, we compiled and published a database of 2277 HPPT results for 1366 unique test substances (Strickland et al. in Arch Toxicol 97:2825-2837, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-023-03530-3 ). Here we report a detailed analysis of the value of HPPT data for classification of chemicals as skin sensitizers under the United Nations' Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). As a result, we propose the dose per skin area (DSA) used for classification by the GHS to be replaced by or complemented with a dose descriptor that may better reflect sensitization incidence [e.g., the DSA causing induction of sensitization in one individual (DSA1+) or the DSA leading to an incidence of induction in 5% of the tested individuals (DSA05)]. We also propose standardized concepts and workflows for assessing individual HPPT results, for integrating multiple HPPT results and for using them in concert with Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) data in a weight of evidence (WoE) assessment. Overall, our findings show that HPPT results are often not sufficient for deriving unambiguous classifications on their own. However, where they are, the resulting classifications are reliable and reproducible and can be integrated well with those from other skin sensitization data, such as the LLNA.


Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Humans , Patch Tests , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Allergens/toxicity , Skin , Local Lymph Node Assay
15.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 148: 105595, 2024 Mar.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38453128

Several New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) for hazard assessment of skin sensitisers have been formally validated. However, data regarding their applicability on certain product classes are limited. The purpose of this project was to provide initial evidence on the applicability domain of GARD™skin and GARD™potency for the product class of agrochemical formulations. For this proof of concept, 30 liquid and 12 solid agrochemical formulations were tested in GARDskin for hazard predictions. Formulations predicted as sensitisers were further evaluated in the GARDpotency assay to determine GHS skin sensitisation category. The selected formulations were of product types, efficacy groups and sensitisation hazard classes representative of the industry's products. The performance of GARDskin was estimated by comparing results to existing in vivo animal data. The overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 76.2% (32/42), 85.0% (17/20), and 68.2% (15/22), respectively, with the predictivity for liquid formulations being slightly higher compared to the solid formulations. GARDpotency correctly subcategorized 14 out of the 17 correctly predicted sensitisers. Lack of concordance was justifiable by compositional or borderline response analysis. In conclusion, GARDskin and GARDpotency showed satisfactory performance in this initial proof-of-concept study, which supports consideration of agrochemical formulations being within the applicability domain of the test methods.


Agrochemicals , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Animals , Agrochemicals/chemistry , Irritants/pharmacology , Skin , Biological Assay , Proof of Concept Study , Animal Testing Alternatives
20.
Contact Dermatitis ; 90(6): 574-584, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38501375

BACKGROUND: Professional ice hockey players may contract irritant and allergic contact dermatitis. AIMS: To investigate the presence of contact allergy (CA) in professional ice hockey players in Sweden. METHODS: Ten teams from the two top leagues were assessed for potential occupational exposure to sensitizers. Exactly 107 players were patch tested with an extended baseline series and a working series, in total 74 test preparations. The CA rates were compared between the ice hockey players and controls from the general population and dermatitis patients. RESULTS: One out of 4 players had at least one contact allergy. The most common sensitizers were Amerchol L 101, nickel and oxidized limonene. CA was as common in the ice hockey players as in dermatitis patients and significantly more common than in the general population. Fragrances and combined sensitizers in cosmetic products (fragrances + preservatives + emulsifier) were significantly more common in ice hockey players compared with the general population. CONCLUSION: The possible relationship between CA to fragrances and cosmetic products on the one hand and the presence of dermatitis on the other should be explored further.


Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Dermatitis, Occupational , Hockey , Patch Tests , Humans , Sweden/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Adult , Male , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Nickel/adverse effects , Young Adult , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Cosmetics/adverse effects , Perfume/adverse effects , Case-Control Studies , Middle Aged , Limonene/adverse effects
...